![]() |
| Home | Visitor and Patient Guide | For Physicians | Health Information | Physician Directory | Contact Us | |||||
| News & Information |
|
|
Flu Virus Becoming Resistant to Drug
[March 4, 2009] A new government report shows an increase in resistance to the antiviral drug Tamiflu®. This antiviral drug is primarily linked to influenza A strains, the most common type of flu circulating in the United States.
Last year was the first time Tamiflu resistance was seen anywhere in the world. Almost 100 percent of the influenza A, or H1N1, strain is now resistant to the drug. This is above the 12 percent increase during last year's flu season, says report author Dr. Alicia Fry, a medical epidemiologist with the influenza division at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). "This makes using antiviral drugs very tricky for flu," notes Dr. John Treanor, director of the division of infectious diseases at the University of Rochester Medical Center. "It is more complicated." "Our message is to get vaccinated with the influenza vaccine", emphasizes Dr. Fry. "The current influenza vaccine has three different virus types in it, and the H1 strain that is in the vaccine is the same strain that is resistant to oseltamivir, or Tamiflu, so the best prevention is still getting the vaccine." Concern Despite Mild Flu SeasonDr. Neil Schachter, medical director of respiratory care at Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York City and author of The Good Doctor's Guide to Colds and Flu remarks, "We're fortunate in that this is a very mild flu season, and we're not seeing either the numbers of cases or the complications that we normally see in a bad flu season". Yet, "while it is of concern that there are viruses that are developing resistance, it's not all the strains and it's not all the drugs. We're not painted into a corner," he adds. Many people with the flu are never treated at all, Dr. Schachter points out and reiterates that, "While there's still a flu season out there, everyone should get vaccinated." Dr. Len Horovitz, a pulmonary specialist with Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City, further explains, "It's not the same as the analogy to bacteria that have developed resistance when they get more virulent. These are natural mutational shifts and drifts, not a result of the overuse of Tamiflu. Just because it's becoming more resistant does not mean that it's a more deadly virus." A second study found that the Tamiflu-resistant virus still poses a significant health threat to certain groups of patients, in particular those with compromised immune systems who are hospitalized. Both studies were expected to be published in the March issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). Doctors Respond to the ResistanceIn response to the increasing resistance to Tamiflu, the CDC recommends that doctors test suspected flu cases to determine the exact strain of the virus and what medications should be prescribed based on results of these tests. In the past, two flu drugs were discontinued. In this case, the CDC issued a recommendation against using amantadine and rimantadine in 2006 because of resistant strains of influenza B and H3. However, these drugs work by a different mechanism than Tamiflu and the other drug in its class, Relenza (zanamivir). In an additional study, researchers in the Netherlands recommended that patients be tested for specific strains of influenza and, if needed, be isolated so as to avoid hospital outbreaks. The authors also cautioned that the conclusions and recommendations were based on only a small number of patients. Effectiveness of Flu Shot SupportedPneumonia is a potentially fatal complication of the flu. And, upon further research, the flu shot was determined to be more effective in reducing influenza- and pneumonia-related healthcare visits than the nasal spray form of the vaccine. This finding was based on a third study published in the March issue of JAMA. The authors of the study, from the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center in Silver Spring, Md., based their conclusions on an analysis of more than 1 million military personnel over three flu seasons. The flu shot appeared to confer greater immunity than the nasal spray over all three seasons (2004-2005, 2005-2006 and 2006-2007), particularly among soldiers who had been vaccinated in previous seasons. "Vaccination with either version of the vaccine was protective. Vaccine effectiveness was higher among members receiving an inactivated vaccine shot compared to those receiving intranasal vaccine," study author Dr. Zhong Wang says. "When we look at individuals not immunized during the prior season, vaccine effectiveness became relatively similar between these two groups." Always consult your physician for more information. |
||||
|
|
|