Search Keck Sites:


W.M. Keck Facility
 Yale University
 300 George Street
 Addresses
 
 Contact Us

Yale University School of Medicine

Keck Home Page > Protein Chemistry > FT-ICR MS Services

FT-ICR MS Services

Nano-ESI-FTICR

Electrospray ionization is the most commonly used form of ionization coupled to FTMS system. The current nanospray source configured with our FTMS consumes about 200 – 250 nL of samples per minute with sensitivity in the femtomole range. Typical data acquisition is in the order of seconds so the actual sample consumptions is ~10 nL per data set acquired. Figure 1 shows a sample mass spectrum collected with nESI source. Electrospray ionization produces multiply charged species (ideal for multiply charged peptides/proteins) hence increasing the dynamic mass range that can be detected.


(ESI) High-Resolution (<50KDa)

High resolution is a necessary tool looking at relatively complex mixture of peptides/proteins on single mass spectrum without any LC separation. FTMS offers the highest possible resolution among all mass spectrometers with its maximum peak capacity exceeding that of conventional HPLC separation greater than 200 fold. The spectrum in Figure 2 is a zoomed section of Figure 1 showing the ability to ID multiple peptides with overlapping isotopic distributions.

(ESI) Accurate mass

FTMS is known for its high mass accuracy due to how mass/charge is detected. Ions with a certain mass to charge ratio (m/z) is inversely proportional to its ion cyclotron frequency (higher m/z ~ lower frequency). Since we can measure frequency very accurately, and the superconducting magnet is very homogeneous, we can indirectly calculate the mass of a given ion very accurately. See Marshall et. al. for detailed calculation and derivation of the relationship between m/z and ion cyclotron frequency [1]. Average mass accuracy for peptides/proteins within the 500 – 1500 m/z range, and with external calibration, is within 2-5 ppm range (with the lower ppm for internally calibrated spectra, >1ppm possibility). High accurate mass increases the confidence level of peptide/protein identification, and is ideal for structural determination of organic molecules. Figure 3 shows the use of FTMS to distinguish between the monoisotopic peak of a deuterated compound from the second isotopic peak of the non-deuterated compound (mass difference ~0.003 Da).

(ESI) IRMPD MS/MS

InfraRed MultiPhoton Dissociation (IRMPD) is a form of fragmentation that occurs in the ICR cell, and provides structural and peptide-sequencing information. For peptides, b and y' ions are generated after a short (~100-400 ms irradiation of 40-70% power of a 40W CO2 laser) pulse. Figure 4A shows IRMPD fragmentation on Substance P. IRMPD can also be used to study structural information of organic compounds (lower detection limit mass of 120 Da) as seen in Figure 4B. Fragment ions of organic compounds are generated from IRMPD are mapped to determine possible precursor or degradation products.

(ESI) ECD MS/MS

Electron Capture Dissociation fragments ions in the ICR cell by emitting a beam of electrons (typically < 1eV) to the ion cloud. The exact detailed mechanism of ECD is still being investigated by many research groups. Generally c and z· ions are generated. The higher energy that is used for the fragmentation provides high degree of sequence information that is ideal for de novo sequencing and PTM analysis. The reason ECD is preferred for PTM analysis is because the labile modified groups are not dissociated upon fragmentation of the peptide back bone. Like IRMPD, the fragmentation is performed in the millisecond timescale, and shows possibility for online LC MS/MS experiments. Figure 5 shows an ECD spectrum of Substance P.

Top Down/Protein Structure/PTM

With its high mass accuracy and its capability for multiple fragmentation techniques such as InfraRed MultiPhoton Dissociation (IRMPD), Collision Induced Dissociation (CID), and Electron Captured Dissociation (ECD), the FTMS instrument is well suited for "unique" analysis of "unusual" samples; particularly in the area of PTM proteins. The initial step for PTM analysis involves comparison of control vs. modified sample of purified peptide/protein profiles in a single mass spectrum by nESI. Peaks difference, as determined by accurate mass, corresponding to proposed modification is targeted for fragmentation experiment. Depending on the PTM of interest, fragmentation by ECD typically retains the covalently bound labile modification, and site of modification is elucidated from fragment ion masses. IRMPD fragmentation, is complimentary to ECD, and shows a loss of neutral mass corresponding to the mass of the PTM component(s). Cleavages along the peptide backbone, as in ECD fragmentation, are also observed.

A typical procedure to determine site of phosphorylation with FT-ICR and its IRMPD and ECD capabilities, and without the use of prior separation/enrichment methods (though these methods are advantages to increasing S/N of peaks of interest for subsequent fragmenation, particularly when stoichiomietry is not sufficiently high, ie. >25%) is described below. Initially, nESI broadband mass spectrum of tryptic digest of control (non-phosphorylated) protein is compared with that of the phosphorylated sample. Differences in spectral peak features are determined for possibility of phosphorylation modification (as indicated by peptides differing in mass of 79.966 Da (or multiple of 79.996 Da for multiple phosphorylation sites). Difference, tentatively identified phosphorylated peptide peak(s) are targeted for fragmentation by IRMPD and ECD. IRMPD and ECD are complimentary fragmentation techniques for identification of phosphorylation site. Neutral loss of HPO3- (79.966) by IRMPD indicates that the peptide is phosphorylated. Separately, ECD of phosphopeptides provides highly efficient cleavages of amino acid backbone of peptide without cleaving the labile phosphoryl-bond. Mapping of product ion masses will elucidate the site of phosphorylation by indicating product ion(s) which retain the phospho-group. IRMPD and ECD can be also be used simultaneously to provide both neutral loss for phospho-peptide ID and non cleavages of phospho-bond to site of phosphorylation ID.

Simultaneous use of IRMPD and ECD shows promising future technique in phosphoproteomic profiling of intact proteins (for proteins <45kDa) by using IRMPD to "untangle" protein for high efficiency fragmentation of ECD to determine site of phosphorylation of intact protein.

LC-MS

Introduction of lower complexity samples into the FTMS instrument can be accomplished either by Electrospray Ionization (ESI or nESI) or Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization (MALDI), and transition between these two modes can be done within minutes. Nano-ESI, due to its low sample consumption rate (with spray needle id between 5-30μm) and high sensitivity, is normally preferred over conventional ESI when sample is limited (<20μL, at <10μM). Typical spray conditions for biological mixture (low picomole/μL conc.) is 15μL/hr of sample that is in 50:49.8:0.2% methanol:water:acetic acid. Efficiency of the ESI process is hindered by presence of salts/detergents (<0.01%), therefore sample with high salt concentration require a simple ZipTip procedure prior to subjecting to FTMS analysis. If the amount of sample (for peptides, ie in gel tryptic digest of protein spot from 2D SDS-PAGE) is even more limited, MALDI is used where 1-2μL of sample is mixed with 1μL of [2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB)] matrix and spotted on MALDI plate. For higher complex (ie. tryptic digest of 4 protein mixture) biological samples, nano-flow HPLC can be coupled to nESI for additional separation.

For extreme complex biological matrices (tryptic digests of >100 proteins, ie. cell lysate, serum, etc.), MultiDimensional Protein Identification Technology (MuDPIT) can be implemented [2] Figure 6 shows a zoomed in staggered plot of one of 9 salt plug elutions from an automated MuDPIT experiment for tryptic digestion of a 4 protein complex mixture. Typically 20μL of 50-100 ug of protein digest solution (3<pH <5) are loaded onto a strong cation exchange column, and subsequently eluted with multi-steps salt elution onto a reversed phase column where peptides are separated and directly eluted into the FTMS via nESI. We are currently testing various approaches/modifications of MuDPIT protocols to optimize the FTMS system for comparative analysis of control vs. "disease" proteome. The MuDPIT data acquisition has been automated, and we are currently working to automate the analysis for protein identification from the collected data.

References

[1] Marshall, AG; Hendrickson, CL; and Jackson, GS; (1998) Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry: A Primer. Mass Spectrometry Reviews, 17, pp.1-35.

[2] Washburn, MP; Wolters, D; and Yates III, JR; (2001) Larg-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identrification technology. Nature Biotechnology, 19, pp242-247.

Figures


Figure 1. Spectrum of nanospray ESI of tryptic digest mixture of alcohol dehydrogenase, BSA, carbonic anhydrase, and myoglobin. Spectrum was obtained from pooled C18 ZipTip elution of 4 proteins mixture that have been tryptic digested.


Figure 2. Zoomed inset of Figure 1. Note the distinction of monoisotopic peak of peptide AD, AH, and BG. The average resolving power for these peaks is ~110,000, 2MB data points. This is a “typical” high resolution mass spectrum obtained for the purposed of protein identification based on tryptic masses from complex mixture. Extremely high resolution (>1,000,000) can also be obtained. We highest resolution obtained for protein at mass 8500 is 1.6 million.


Figure 3. Accurate mass for distinguishing mass differences ~0.003Da.


Figure 4A. IRMPD of Substance P.


Figure 4B. IRMPD fragmentation of Bryostatin 2. A schematic diagram outlines either the degradation of bryostatin-2 (top to bottom) or the synthesis of bryostatin-2 (bottom to top) is shown under the spectrum.


Figure 5. ECD of Substance P.


Figure 6. Sample stack plots of MuDPIT experiment. The plot is a zoomed in section of one of nine salt plug elution of a 2D LC MS run. Each row corresponds to a collected mass spectrum during peptide elution from a 75 um reverse phase C18 column. Note that average peptides elute within 2-4 spectra.

 

    Top of Page
Medical Center Yale-New Haven Hospital Yale University

Copyright © 2003, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. All rights reserved.
Comments or suggestions to site editor.

Last modified: 23-Oct-2006 (GB)