The sample was run April 14th and the results are saved in file BSA0414A. The molecular weight (MW) was calculated using the ASTRA software. n the Astra approach, the MW is determined by solving the equation that relates the excess scattered light, measured at several angles, to the concentration of protein and the weight-average molar mass. The results are summarized in Table 1.
Table
1. Results of SEC-LS analysis for run BSA0414A.
|
Run |
|
|
disperse peak?* |
Comments |
||
|
# |
(ml) |
|
|
|||
| BSA0414A |
|
~12.8 |
|
|
|
<8% of total A280 |
| BSA0414A |
|
~13.8 |
|
|
|
|
| BSA0414A |
|
~15.5 |
|
|
|
|
* A monodisperse peak is a peak that contains one type of molecule of defined MW (e.g., pure monomeric protein). The peak is thus homogenous with respect to MW. In the case of a monodisperse peak, the average molar mass will be independent of the averaging method used and polydispersity will equal to 1. If the peak contains a mixture of species of different molar masses (polydisperse peak; for example, a mixture of dimer [or tetramer] and monomer) the weight average molecular weight, Mw, will vary across the eluting peak and the average mass (for the entire peak) will change depending on the averaging method and polydispersity will be greater then 1.a calculated from propagation of errors from calibration curve used and from noise in the LS and RI signal
The important findings from the SEC-LS/RI/UV
analysis of BSA include:
The detailed report consists of the following pages:
Comments:
File BSA0414A: 100 mg loaded.
As indicated on the UV trace shown on Strip Chart View Plot, your sample eluted from the gel permeation column in three peaks with the maxima at ~12.8 mL (peak #1), 13.8 mL (peak #2) and 15.5 mL (peak #3; major peak). The mass distribution between these peak was: the major peak that eluted at ~15.5 mL contained ~73 % of the total eluted mass, the minor peak that eluted at ~ 13.8 mL represented ~19 % of the total mass and the smallest peak (~12.8 mL) contained less then 8 % of the total eluted mass.
Peak ID Plot indicates the boundaries of the peaks that were selected for molecular mass calculations using the ASTRA software. The molecular masses calculated from the Debye plot are presented in the Summary report from ASTRA as Mn (number average molar mass), Mw (weight average molar mass) and Mz (z-average molar mass; see Molar Mass Moments in ASTRA Summary Report Explanation Chart for details). The average molecular weight was estimated as 215 kDa for peak #1, 137 kDa for peak #2 and 65.6 kDA for peak #3. There was no variation in the molecular weight across peak #3 (see plot of Distribution of Molar Mass vs. elution time) indicating this peak was homogenous with respect to MW and contained only a monomer of BSA protein. The MW for slices across peak #2 range from 130 kDa to 150 kDa indicating this peak contained a dimer of your protein that was separated from the monomer during gel permeation (see plot of Distribution of Molar Mass vs elution time). This peak has not been fully separated from peak #1 and the estimated Mw is elevated at the regions where the peaks are overlaping (due to the fact that light scaterring is measuring Mw, the weight average molecular weight of all the species present in solution). Peak #1 is clearly a polydisperse peak that contained a mixture of different oligomers with the Mw varying from 190 kDa to 240 kDa within the boundaries of the peak (see plot of Distribution of Molar Mass vs. elution time).
The molecular weights determined
by both analyses, i.e. "two detector" method and ASTRA analysis, are in
good agreement (see
Table 1).
AUX1 = UV signal (absorbance at 280 nm; blue)
AUX2 = RI signal (refractive index changes;
green)
90° Detector = LS trace recorded for the
detector at 90° angle (highest scattering signal; red)
(please note that the RI and UV signals are scaled to
LS signal)
Vertical lines indicate boundaries of peak/peaks selected for ASTRA analysis
File : C:\WTC\ASTRA450\RUNS3-~1\BSA0414A.ADF
Sample ID : BSA 100 ug in100 ul (750 loop) 20 mM HEPES, KCl 100mM,
1 mM EDTA pH=8.0
Operator : Ewa
Collection time :
Tue Apr 14, 1998 12:49 PM
Instrument type :
DAWN DSP
Cell type :
K5
Laser wavelength :
632.8 nm
Solvent name :
water
Solvent RI :
1.332
Calibration constants
DAWN :
3.0090e-05
"AUX2" :
2.1093e-04
Flow rate :
0.400 mL/min
Processing time :
Wed May 27, 1998 01:24 PM
DAWN/AUX2 delay : 0.130
mL
Fit
method / model :
Debye
Calculation
method :
dn/dc + AUX Constant
Detectors
used :
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
RESULTS
PEAK #1
PEAK #2
PEAK #3
Volume (mL) :
12.650 - 13.220 13.620
- 14.313 15.127 -
16.483
Slices :
172
209
408
A2 (mol mL/g²) :
0.000e+00
0.000e+00
0.000e+00
Fit
degree :
1
1
1
Injected
Mass (g) :
0.0000e+00
0.0000e+00
0.0000e+00
Calc. Mass (g) :
4.7522e-06
1.3333e-05
7.5068e-05
dn/dc
(mL/g) :
0.184
0.184
0.184
Polydispersity(Mw/Mn)
:
1.003±0.026
1.001±0.015
1.000±0.010
Polydispersity(Mz/Mn)
:
1.005±0.045
1.002±0.026
1.001±0.017
Molar
Mass Moments (g/mol)
Mn
:
2.149e+05 (1.8%)
1.365e+05 (1.0%) 6.558e+04
(0.7%)
Mw
:
2.154e+05 (1.8%)
1.366e+05 (1.1%) 6.561e+04
(0.7%)
Mz
:
2.160e+05 (4%)
1.367e+05 (2.4%) 6.563e+04
(1.5%)
R.M.S.
Radius Moments (nm)
Rn
:
4.6 (190%)*
5.1 (111%)
3.7 (161%)
Rw
:
4.8 (176%)
5.3 (103%)
3.8 (150%)
Rz
:
5.0 (176%)
5.5 (103%)
3.9 (150%)
* Please note that light scattering can be used to estimate size/radius of objects that are of the size that correspond to at least 1/20th of the incident light.
Upper panel:
The solid line/lines indicates the trace from RI detector while "dots"
are Mw determined for each slice, i.e., every 3.3 microliter of
the elution volume.
The ASTRA Summary Report contains information about the calculated molecular weights (MW) as well as collection and processing parameters that were applied during data analysis.
The following chart is designed to guide you through the Summary Report
(adopted from ASTRA manual; Wyatt Technology). Please note that the
Result section presents data for ALL peaks selected for analysis.
Peak selection and boundaries are shown on the attached "Peak ID" graph.
This part of the report contains information about data collection, instrument used, type of flow cell in the LS detector and solvent in the mobile phase.
The values of the calibration constants used during data processing
are shown along with the information regarding mass detector (refractive
index or UV) was used to estimate eluted mass:
AUX2: RI detector (might be used as a mass detector when the dn/dc value is known)
Flow rate used during SEC run is also shown.
This part of the report refers to the fitting method that was used by ASTRA to carry out the molecular mass determination
Processing time:
date and time of processing
This section summarizes the molecular weight calculations for each peak
selected (please refer to attached "Peak ID" graph for peak identification).
Volume:
Mn is the molar mass (or molecular weight, MW); this might for instance be measured by osmometry.
Mw is the molar mass (or molecular weight, MW); this might for instance be measured by light scattering method.

The errors represent ONLY the statistical consistency of the data and DO NOT PROVIDE AN ABSOLUTE ERROR FOR THE ANALYSIS. The sources of errors that are not accounted for are, for example, uncertainty in the dn/dc value, calibration constants or normalization coefficients.
(1)
where:
R(Q) is the excess intensity of scattered light at DAWN angle Q
c is the sample concentration
Mw is the weight-average molecular weight
A2 is a second virial coefficient
K* is an optical parameter equal to 4p2n2 (dn/dc)2 / (lo4NA)
n is the solvent refractive index and dn/dc is the refractive index increment
NA is Avogadro’s number
lo
is the
wavelength of the scattered light in vacuum.
The function P(Q) describes the angular dependence of scattered light.
The expansion of 1/ P(Q) to first order gives:
1/ P(Q) = 1 + (16p2/3l2)
<rg2>. sin2(Q/2)
+ f4 sin4(Q/2) +...
There are several ways in which Eq.
(1) (that relates excess of scattered light to concentration and weight-average
molar mass) can be solved to get Mw and <rg2>.
The parameter "Fit method/model" refers to the actual
method applied.
It gives good results over a wider range of molecular weight as compared
to the Zimm formalism.
This is the most popular method for analysis of light scattering data.
It works well for mid-sized molecules (rms radius up to ~20-50 nm).
Useful for large molecules.
where u = (4p/l)2<r2>sin2(Q/2).
P(Q) is a nonlinear function of <r2>,
an iterative nonlinear least square fit is used during fitting. This fitting
method might be advantageous for large random coil molecules (the
order of polynomial used during fitting is given in RESULT section as "FIT
DEGREE").
|
|
|
|
|
|
Front Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|