HPLC Size Exclusion Chromatography/Laser Light Scattering Determination of Native Protein Molecular Weights


SEC-LS Report for BSA

         Please find enclosed the data that resulted from the analysis carried out on your sample of BSA submitted on April 13, 1998.

        The sample was run April 14th and the results are saved in file BSA0414A.   The molecular weight (MW) was calculated by two independent approaches, 1) the "two detector" method and 2) by using the ASTRA software.   In the the "two detector" method, the MW is determined from a calibration curve obtained from a series of standard proteins.  This calibration determines the relationship between MW and the ratio of the light scattering (LS) and refractive index (RI) signals.  In the Astra approach, the MW is determined by solving the equation that relates the excess scattered light, measured at several angles, to the concentration of protein and the weight-average molar mass.  The results are summarized in Table 1.
 
 Table 1. Results of SEC-LS analysis for run BSA0414A.
 

 
 
Run 
Peak on UV Trace 
Calculated MW (kDa) 
Mono-
disperse peak?* 
 
 
Comments 
 
Elution Volume 
(ml) 
At peak maximum as calculated via the "Two detector" method
Average for the entire peak as calculated via Astra software 
BSA0414A
1 
~12.8
233 ± 36a
215 
No 
Weak RI signal 
<8% of total A280 
BSA0414A
2 
~13.8
141± 9a 
 137 
Yes 
19% of total A280 
BSA0414A
3 
~15.5 
67 ± 1a 
65.6 
Yes 
73% of total A280 
 
 * A monodisperse peak is a peak that contains one type of molecule of defined MW (e.g., pure monomeric protein).  The peak is thus homogenous with respect to MW.  In the case of a  monodisperse peak, the average molar mass will be independent of the averaging method used and polydispersity will equal to 1.  If the peak contains a mixture of species of different molar masses (polydisperse peak; for example, a mixture of dimer [or tetramer] and monomer) the weight average molecular weight, Mw, will vary across the eluting peak and the average mass (for the entire peak) will change depending on the averaging method and  polydispersity will be greater then 1.

a calculated from propagation of errors from calibration curve used and from noise in the LS and RI signal

CONCLUSIONS:

The important findings from the SEC-LS/RI/UV analysis of BSA include:
 

 
The detailed report  consists of the following pages:  
Comments:

File BSA0414A: 100 mg loaded.

        As indicated on the UV trace shown on Strip Chart View Plot, your sample eluted from the gel permeation column in three peaks with the maxima at ~12.8 mL (peak #1), 13.8 mL (peak #2) and 15.5 mL (peak #3; major peak).  The mass distribution between these peak was: the major peak that eluted at ~15.5 mL contained  ~73 % of the total eluted mass, the minor peak that eluted at  ~ 13.8 mL represented ~19 % of the total mass and the smallest peak (~12.8 mL) contained less then 8 % of the total eluted mass.  Based on the LS and RI data, and the attached Calibration curve, the molecular weight was estimated by the "two detector" method as 233±36 kDa for peak #1,  141±9 kDa for peak #2 and 67±1  kDa for peak #3 (seeReport from "two detector" analysis).  The UV/RI ratio was identical, within the errors limits, for all three peaks indicating that they most likely contained different oligomers of the same polypeptide (see Report from "two detector" analysis).

 Peak ID Plot indicates the boundaries of  the peaks that were selected for molecular mass calculations using the ASTRA software.  The molecular masses calculated from the Debye plot are presented in the Summary report from ASTRA as Mn (number average molar mass), Mw (weight average molar mass) and Mz (z-average molar mass;  see Molar Mass Moments in ASTRA Summary Report Explanation Chart for details).  The average molecular weight was estimated as 215 kDa for peak #1, 137 kDa for peak #2 and 65.6 kDA for peak #3.  There was no variation in the molecular weight across peak #3 (see plot of Distribution of Molar Mass vs. elution time) indicating this peak was homogenous with respect to MW and contained only a monomer of BSA protein.  The MW for slices across peak #2 range from 130 kDa to 150 kDa indicating this peak contained a dimer of your protein that was separated from the monomer during gel permeation (see plot of Distribution of Molar Mass vs elution time).  This peak has not been fully separated from peak #1 and the estimated Mw is elevated at the regions where the peaks are overlaping (due to the fact that light scaterring is measuring Mw, the weight average molecular weight of all the species present in solution).  Peak #1 is clearly a polydisperse peak that contained a mixture of different oligomers with the Mw varying from 190 kDa to 240 kDa within the boundaries of the peak (see plot of Distribution of Molar Mass vs. elution time).

        The molecular weights determined by both analyses, i.e. "two detector" method and ASTRA analysis, are in good agreement (see Table 1).



 

 
 

"Two detector" Report BSA0414A
 

 
Peak 
max UV at 
(mL) 
UV 
error 
LS 
error 
RI 
error 
UV/RI
error 
LS/RI
error 
MW   
(kDa)
error   
(kDa)
#1 ~12.8 0.005 0.001 0.036 0.002 0.007 0.001
0.7 
0.2 
5.1 
0.8 
233 
36 
#2 ~13.8 0.012 0.001 0.056 0.002 0.018 0.001
0.67
0.07 
3.1 
0.2 
141 
9 
#3 ~15.5  0.046 0.001 0.113 0.002 0.077 0.001
0.60
0.02 
1.47 
0.03 
67 
1 
 

 
 
 

Calibration curve for "two detector" method

 
 
Standard proteins 
MW 
(kDa) 
  
LS/RI 
MW calculated  
from LS/RI calibration   (kDa) 
Cytochrome C
12.3 
0.25 
11.33 
Carbonic Anhydrase
29.0 
0.65 
29.2 
Ovalbumin
43.2 
0.95 
42.6 
BSA
66.3 
1.47 
66.5 
Alcohol Dehydrogenase
147 
3.18 
144 
ChartObject two detector CALIBRATION CURVE  MW=f(LS/RI)


 Peak ID Plot
 

 
AUX1  =   UV signal (absorbance at 280 nm;  blue)
AUX2  =   RI signal  (refractive index changes;  green)
90° Detector   =  LS trace recorded for the detector at 90° angle (highest scattering signal;  red)
                             (please note that the RI and UV signals are scaled to LS signal)

        Vertical lines indicate boundaries of peak/peaks selected for ASTRA analysis




ASTRA 4.70.04 (Beta #4) summary Report for BSA0414A

File : C:\WTC\ASTRA450\RUNS3-~1\BSA0414A.ADF
Sample ID : BSA 100 ug in100 ul (750 loop) 20 mM HEPES, KCl 100mM, 1 mM EDTA  pH=8.0
Operator : Ewa
 

COLLECTION INFORMATION                                                                            

Collection time :             Tue  Apr 14, 1998  12:49 PM
Instrument type :            DAWN DSP
Cell type :                      K5
Laser wavelength :         632.8  nm
Solvent name :               water
Solvent RI :                   1.332
Calibration constants
     DAWN :                   3.0090e-05
     "AUX2" :                  2.1093e-04
Flow rate :                     0.400 mL/min

PROCESSING INFORMATION                                                                            

Processing time :                  Wed  May 27, 1998  01:24 PM
DAWN/AUX2 delay :         0.130 mL
Fit method / model :             Debye
Calculation method :            dn/dc + AUX Constant
Detectors used :                  6  7  8  9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

RESULTS
                                                          PEAK #1                 PEAK #2                PEAK #3

Volume (mL) :                               12.650 - 13.220         13.620 - 14.313          15.127 - 16.483
Slices :                                                 172                             209                           408
A2 (mol mL/g&sup2;) :                     0.000e+00                  0.000e+00                  0.000e+00
Fit degree :                                         1                                1                                1
Injected Mass (g) :                        0.0000e+00               0.0000e+00              0.0000e+00
Calc. Mass (g) :                                  4.7522e-06               1.3333e-05               7.5068e-05
dn/dc (mL/g) :                                   0.184                         0.184                         0.184
Polydispersity(Mw/Mn) :               1.003±0.026               1.001±0.015             1.000±0.010
Polydispersity(Mz/Mn) :                1.005±0.045               1.002±0.026             1.001±0.017

Molar Mass Moments (g/mol)
 Mn :                                        2.149e+05 (1.8%)           1.365e+05 (1.0%)         6.558e+04 (0.7%)
 Mw :                                       2.154e+05 (1.8%)           1.366e+05 (1.1%)         6.561e+04 (0.7%)
 Mz :                                        2.160e+05 (4%)              1.367e+05 (2.4%)         6.563e+04 (1.5%)

R.M.S. Radius Moments (nm)
 Rn :                                             4.6 (190%)*                        5.1 (111%)                3.7 (161%)
 Rw :                                            4.8 (176%)                        5.3 (103%)                3.8 (150%)
 Rz :                                             5.0 (176%)                        5.5 (103%)                3.9 (150%)
 

* Please note that light scattering can be used to estimate size/radius of objects that are of the size that correspond to at least 1/20th of the incident light.


back to SEC-LS/UV/RI Report for BSA

Debye Plot  BSA0414A

Upper panel: 

Lower panel :


back to SEC-LS/UV/RI Report for BSA

Molar Mass Distribution Plot

 
The solid line/lines indicates the trace from RI detector while "dots" are Mw determined for each slice, i.e., every 3.3 microliter of the elution volume.



  
ASTRA Summary Report Explanation Chart


 

The ASTRA Summary Report contains information about the calculated molecular weights (MW) as well as collection and processing parameters that were applied during data analysis.

The following chart is designed to guide you through the Summary Report (adopted from ASTRA manual; Wyatt Technology).  Please note that the Result section presents data for ALL peaks selected for analysis.  Peak selection and boundaries are shown on the attached "Peak ID" graph.
 


COLLECTION INFORMATION

This part of the report contains information about data collection, instrument used, type of  flow cell in the LS detector and solvent in the mobile phase.

The values of the calibration constants used during data processing are shown along with the information regarding mass detector (refractive index or UV) was used to estimate eluted mass:
 

AUX1: UV detector (which might be used as a mass detector when the extinction coefficient is known)

AUX2:  RI detector (might be used as a mass detector when the dn/dc value is known)

Flow rate used during SEC run is also shown.

 


PROCESSING INFORMATION

 
This part of the report refers to the fitting method that was used by ASTRA to carry out the molecular mass determination

Processing time:
        date and time of processing
 

Fit method/model:


Calculation method: dn/dc value + AUX constant: means that the known dn/dc was used along with the AUX detector reading. Alternatively, the total injected mass can be used with the assumption of 100% recovery of that mass within the analyzed peak value (dn/dc is a refractive index increment of the solute, which usually means the increase in refractive index with protein concentration).
Detectors used: the subset of signals from LS detectors used in the analysis (there is a total of 18 detectors in the DAWN instrument but for aqueous solutions the signal from lower angle detectors, i.e. detectors #3-6 and #16-18, is very noisy and for some samples these readings may be deleted during data processing)  
RESULTS                                                                                  

This section summarizes the molecular weight calculations for each peak selected (please refer to attached "Peak ID" graph for peak identification).

Volume:


Slices:
A2:
Fit Degree:
Injected Mass:
Calc. Mass:
dn/dc value:  
Polydispersity (Mw/Mn): indicates whether the peak is homogenous with respect to molar mass.  A homogeneous (i.e., monodisperse) sample is one that contains only one type of molecule of defined MW (e.g. pure monomeric protein), thus the average mass is independent of the averaging method and polydispersity will equal 1. If the sample contains a mixture of species of different molar masses (i.e., polydisperse sample; for example, a mixture of dimer or tetramer and monomer) the average mass will depend on the averaging method and the polydispersity will be different from 1. Polydispersity (Mz/Mn):
Molar Mass Moments (g/mol)
   
 

Mn is the molar mass (or molecular weight, MW); this might for instance be measured by osmometry.

 

 

Mw: Weight-average molar mass is defined as:

 

 
Mw is the molar mass (or molecular weight, MW); this might for instance be measured by light scattering method.

   

 
 

Mz: Z-average molar mass is defined as:
 
  Mz is the molecular weight (MW); this might for instance be measured during sedimentation analysis.
   

R.M.S. Radius Moments (nm)
In general, ASTRA is solving the following equation that relates the excess scattered light to the concentration and weight-average molar mass:

 

                               (1)

 

where:

 
R(Q)     is the excess intensity of scattered light at DAWN angle Q

c           is the sample concentration

Mw       is the weight-average molecular weight

A2           is a second virial coefficient

K*        is an optical parameter equal to 4p2n2 (dn/dc)2 / (lo4NA)

n           is the solvent refractive index and dn/dc is the refractive index increment

NA         is Avogadro’s number

lo          is the wavelength of the scattered light in vacuum.

 

The function P(Q) describes the angular dependence of scattered light.

The expansion of 1/ P(Q) to first order gives:

 

1/ P(Q) = 1 + (16p2/3l2) <rg2>. sin2(Q/2) + f4 sin4(Q/2) +...

 

There are several ways in which Eq. (1) (that relates excess of scattered light to concentration and weight-average molar mass) can be solved to get Mw and <rg2>. The parameter "Fit method/model" refers to the actual method applied.

 


Debye Fit Method:

constructs a plot of R(Q)/K*c vs. sin2(Q/2) and fits a polynomial in sin2(Q/2) to the data, thereby obtaining Mw and <rg2> from the intercept and slope at zero angle (the order of polynomial used during fitting is given in the RESULT section as "FIT DEGREE").

It gives good results over a wider range of molecular weight as compared to the Zimm formalism.

 


Zimm Fit Method: constructs a plot of K*c/R(Q) vs. sin2(Q/2) and fits a polynomial in sin2(Q/2) to the data, thereby obtaining Mw and <rg2> from the intercept and slope at zero angle (the order of polynomial used during fitting is given in the RESULT section as "FIT DEGREE").

 
This is the most popular method for analysis of light scattering data. It works well for mid-sized molecules (rms radius up to ~20-50 nm).

 


Berry Fit Method: constructs a plot of SQRT{K*c/R(Q)} vs. sin2(Q/2) and fits a polynomial in sin2(Q/2) to the data  (the order of polynomial used during fitting is given in RESULT section as "FIT DEGREE").

 
Useful for large molecules.

 


Random Coil Method:
 
Eq. (1) is solved after inserting the theoretical form factor P(Q) for random coils given by:

where u = (4p/l)2<r2>sin2(Q/2).

P(Q) is a nonlinear function of <r2>, an iterative nonlinear least square fit is used during fitting. This fitting method might be advantageous for large random coil molecules  (the order of polynomial used during fitting is given in RESULT section as "FIT DEGREE").

 

Please note that all the above methods will give nearly identical results for small molecules (rms radius <10nm). Thus, any of the fitting formalisms can be used interchangeably for proteins with MW <1x106 Da.


 Introduction to Light  Scattering
 Light Scattering  Theory 
 Light Scattering  Data Set  
Results for Standard Proteins
Light Scattering  Service
Light Scattering
Front Page