DATE |
TOPIC |
SPEAKER
|
| September 3 |
Intro/ Philosophy of Mind and Reductionism |
Marina & Mark/ Sloan Warren |
| September 5 &10 |
Neurogenetics |
John Carlson |
| September 12, 17 |
Psychophysics - somatosensory |
Barry Green |
| September 19, 24 |
Systems physiology |
Mark Laubach |
| September 26, Oct 1 |
Neurodegeneration |
Sreeganga Chandra |
|
|
|
Michael Koelle |
|
|
Genetic approaches to neurodevelopment |
Elke Stein |
| October 17, 22 |
Genetics of psychiatric disease |
Arthur Simen |
| October 24, 29 |
Channels and auditory systems physiology |
Joe Santos-Sacchi |
| October 31, Nov 5 |
Structure of the synapse
|
Thomas Biederer
|
| November 7, 12 |
Synaptic plasticity |
Chris Pittenger |
| November 13* |
Biotechology and neuroscience |
Vincent Pieribone |
| November 19-28 |
NO MEETING
|
|
| December 1**, 3 |
CNS control of metabolism
|
Rory McCrimmon
|
| December 5, 10 |
Human imaging and ingestive behavior |
Dana Small |
| December 17 |
Hand in final papers
|
Marina & Mark |
* Please note that this is a THURSDAY. ** This is a MONDAY.
Course Format: Each topic will be covered during two classes: the first will be a lecture from a Yale faculty member on the state of a field of neuroscience, and the second a student-led discussion of some pertinent literature. The first class will acquaint us with the fundamentals of a particular field and is an opportunity to ask questions about the research topic. The second class will consist of an in-depth discussion of at least two research papers of the lecturer's choice, and will be led by two students. Consideration will be paid to the following questions: What is the objective of this research? How was itor has it beenaccomplished? Is this good neuroscience, or are there weaknesses from which we can learn? Copies of these papers will be posted on the course website, and will also be available in Carol Russo's office (please thank Carol when you see her).
Participation is one of the requirements for the course. Active participation will enable us to learn from one another and to delve into the details of the two papers. In discussing and learning about the strengths and limitations of a particular approach to neuroscience, hopefully we can begin to understand the interesting questions that drive that particular field and how those questions relate to other fields.
|