Laboratory Investigation
United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology The United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology
LWW Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
publishes Laboratory Investigation
--
                                      View Future Titles
Through Mar 2001
       Archives
Aug 1965 - Feb 2001
       Search Articles
Aug 1965 - Feb 2001
       Browse by Subject
Aug 1965 - Feb 2001
                      
Instructions to authors

Subscriptions

About the journal
   
  Chromosome Identification Using Hidden Markov Models: Comparison with Neural Networks, Singular Value Decomposition, Principal Components Analysis, and Fisher Discriminant Analysis
Editorial board

Email alerts

'Net Tips

Help

Feedback

Guestbook








  John M. Conroy, Tamara G. Kolda, Dianne P. O'Leary, and Timothy J. O'Leary
   
  Center for Computing Sciences (JMC), Institute for Defense Analyses, Bowie, Maryland; and Computational Sciences and Mathematics Research Department (TGK), Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California; and Computer Science Department and Institute for Advanced Computer Studies (DPO), University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland; and Department of Cellular Pathology (TJO), Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC
   
 

The analysis of G-banded chromosomes remains the most important tool available to the clinical cytogeneticist. The analysis is laborious when performed manually, and the utility of automated chromosome identification algorithms has been limited by the fact that classification accuracy of these methods seldom exceeds about 80% in routine practice. In this study, we use four new approaches to automated chromosome identification - singular value decomposition (SVD), principal components analysis (PCA), Fisher discriminant analysis (FDA), and hidden Markov models (HMM) - to classify three well-known chromosome data sets (Philadelphia, Edinburgh, and Copenhagen), comparing these approaches with the use of neural networks (NN). We show that the HMM is a particularly robust approach to identification that attains classification accuracies of up to 97% for normal chromosomes and retains classification accuracies of up to 95% when chromosome telomeres are truncated or small portions of the chromosome are inverted. This represents a substantial improvement of the classification accuracy for normal chromosomes, and a doubling in classification accuracy for truncated chromosomes and those with inversions, as compared with NN-based methods. HMMs thus appear to be a promising approach for the automated identification of both normal and abnormal G-banded chromosomes.