




 |
  |
| |
|
| |
Comparative
Genomic Hybridization Analysis of Myoepithelial Carcinoma of the Breast
|














|
|
Chris Jones,
Maria P. Foschini, Ranbir Chaggar, Yong-J Lu, Dagan Wells, Janet M. Shipley,
Vincenzo Eusebi, and Sunil R. Lakhani
|
| |
|
| |
Departments
of Histopathology (CJ, SRL), Royal Free and University College Medical School,
University College, London; Sezione di Anatomia (MPF, VE), Istologia e Citologia
Patologica "M. Malpighi," Università di Bologna; The Ludwig
Institute for Cancer Research (RC), UCL Branch; Section of Cell and Experimental
Pathology (Y-JL, JMS), The Institute for Cancer Research, Surrey; and Department
of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (DW), University College London, United Kingdom
|
| |
|
| |
SUMMARY:
Although there seems to be a common stem cell for the two epithelial
cell types in the breast, the vast majority of breast cancers exhibit
a luminal phenotype. Pure myoepithelial carcinomas are rare. We report
our findings of genetic alterations in these tumors. We have analyzed
10 cases of pure myoepithelial cell carcinomas using laser capture microdissection
and comparative genomic hybridization. The mean number of changes was
2.1 (range 0-4), compared with a mean of 8.6 (range 3.6-13.8) in unselected
ductal carcinomas. Common alterations included loss at 16q (3/10 cases),
17p (3/10), 11q (2/10), and 16p (2/10), regions also commonly deleted
in ductal carcinomas. The single case in which both pure myoepithelial
carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma was present showed 2 alterations
in the myoepithelial tumor (losses at 17p and 17q), whereas the invasive
ductal component showed 15 alterations (5 gains and 9 losses), including
loss at 17p. The sharing of 17p loss in myoepithelial and ductal carcinoma
is consistent with a common stem cell model in the breast. The relatively
few genetic alterations in otherwise aggressive neoplasms suggests that
myoepithelial tumors may be a good model for the delineation of genes
important in breast tumorigenesis.
|
| |
|
| |
 |