Page designed and maintained by Octavian Henegariu (Email: or ).

WARNING: The information provided in these pages is copyrighted and is intended for individual use only. No parts of this work (text, tables or pictures) may be commercialized, published or otherwise reproduced without the written consent of the author.
Ref: Cytometry 2001, Vol 43, p101-109.
Get article in PDF format here


PCR | dUTP label | FISH | FISH guide| CCK | Slide prep | CM-FISH | TM-FISH | mArrays | Home

Figure 5 (slideprep)

Slide preparation figures: Fig1 | Fig2 | Fig3 | Fig4 | Fig5 | Fig6 |


Legend: Fig. 5: Identical G-banding staining conditions on metaphases spread in various ways. Staining was done on all slides by keeping them 30" in 0.1% trypsin and 2 minutes in 1.5 % (v/v) Giemsa. Column a: cell suspension in 1:1 methanol:acetic acid; Column b, cell suspension in 3:1 methanol acetic acid. Row 1: slides prepared using water vapors but dried at room temperature; row 2 : slides prepared using water vapors and dried on the hot metal plate; row 3: slides prepared using no water vapors and dried at room temperature. Although banding worked in all conditions, the quality of the bands was a little better when slides were dried at room temperature compared to a heated surface. Also very visible is the increase in contrast of G-banding between cell suspensions in 1:1 fixative (a1,a2,a3) and 3:1 fixative (b1,b2,b3).


Questions, comments, ideas?
Send an e-mail to: Octavian Henegariu


Back to Tavi's Home Page

Last modified on: Feb12, 2001