|
Other Useful NetLinks Handbook Contents Introduction Risk management Insurance program Legal system Medical records Incident reporting Physician-patient Informed consent Infectious disease Confidentiality Patient's rights Risk Home Page |
Informed Consent
Many physicians feel that informed consent is merely a formality
necessary to obtain the patient's signature on a form in order to
allow a specific procedure or treatment to be performed on the
patient. Rather, informed consent should be thought of as a
communication process through which a patient, with the advice and
support of his or her physician, makes decisions concerning the
treatment he or she will receive. The process assists in developing
the critical element of trust between the physician and patient, and
is often the most important discussion a physician will have with his
or her patient.
What Is Informed Consent?
Informed consent is a three part process in which there is an
exchange of information between the physician and patient. The first
part is the disclosure and explanation to the patient, in language
that the patient can understand, of the nature of a proposed
procedure or treatment, its potential risks and benefits, and
reasonable alternatives which may be available. The second part of
the process involves: 1) ensuring that the patient understands what
has been explained to him or her (to the best of the patient's
intellectual capacity); 2) the patient accepting the risks; and 3)
the patient giving his or her consent to undergo the procedure or
treatment. Finally, the process must be documented.
What Information Should Be Discussed With The Patient During The Informed Consent Process?
Where possible, it is desirable for the informed consent
discussion to occur a sufficient period of time before the proposed
procedure or treatment in order to allow the patient time to consider
the information and ask questions. During the discussion, it is
recommended that the physician use language the patient can
understand and avoid the use of "medical jargon." The informed
consent discussion may take place in the physician's office prior the
patient's hospital admission, in the patient's hospital room, and in
emergent situations, in the emergency room or other
procedure/treatment areas of the hospital.
As a general rule, a physician is required to disclose information to a patient that a reasonably prudent person under similar circumstances would want to know. A physician need not disclose all of the risks or complications which may occur, but should discuss: 1) those commonly associated with the procedure or treatment and having a reasonable chance of occurring; and 2) those which have a small chance of occurring, but which have grave consequences. Less common or remote risks/complications should be discussed with the patient if they are significant to that patient.
How Should the Informed Consent Process Be Documented In The Medical Record?
The informed consent process is documented in two separate ways in the medical record. The first way is by obtaining the patient's signature on an appropriate consent form following the necessary disclosure of information upon which a patient can give his or her informed consent. The second way is by documenting the informed consent process in the patient's medical record. This can be an entry in the office records maintained by a physician or by a progress note in the hospital record.
The Consent Form
State law and hospital policies and procedures require that written informed consent must be given by all patients before any non-emergency operation, invasive procedure or treatment, regardless of whether that procedure takes place in the operating room, a treatment room or office. The hospital has developed a consent form for surgical operations and diagnostic or other therapeutic procedures, which must be signed by all patients and the responsible physician. These consent forms can be found on all patient units. When questions arise regarding the need for or use of these forms, the Office of Legal Affairs should be consulted.
Entries In The Medical Record
The contemporaneous documentation of the informed consent process
serves as the foundation for the defense of any subsequent claim by a
patient for lack of informed consent. The signature of the patient on
a consent form alone is not legally determinative evidence that the
patient has given informed consent. Poor or absent documentation will
force a physician to testify from recollection about an event which
occurred several years previously, which will undermine his or her
credibility. In addition, poor or absent documentation may be a
significant factor in a patient's attorney's decision to institute a
legal action.
| |